IMPROVEMENTS
IN HURRICANE TRACK FORECASTING WITH THE GULFSTREAM JET:
A NOAA SUCCESS STORY
May
17, 2004 — Destructive winds, storm surge and heavy rains that produce
flooding make hurricanes one
of nature's most extreme hazards. As hurricane season approaches, Americans
who increasingly populate hurricane-prone areas must prepare themselves
should these storms strike their community. Fortunately, advances by the
NOAA Hurricane Research Division,
part of the NOAA Atlantic
Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, are helping to make this
happen. Using an advanced new sampling method, known as “targeted
observation” strategies, the division has been able to increase
the
accuracy of the models that the NOAA
National Hurricane Center uses to issue its official hurricane track
forecasts by an average of 25 percent (over a five-day forecast period).
Frank Marks, director of the NOAA HRD in Miami, Fla., said, “Targeted
observation strategies support one of NOAA’s primary mission
goals — to serve society’s needs for weather and water,
since it will enable both coastal residents and emergency personnel to
more effectively prepare for hurricanes — thus saving lives and
minimizing property damage.”
With the
2004 Atlantic
hurricane season officially starting on June 1, NOAA’s use of
targeted observations should better prepare citizens for any potential
threats posed by the 2004 hurricane season (NOAA released its 2004
Atlantic Hurricane Season Outlook on May 17, 2004).
Each year,
an average of ten tropical storms develop over the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean
Sea and Gulf of Mexico — six of which become hurricanes. Although
many of these hurricanes remain over the ocean and never impact land,
an average of five hurricanes strike the U.S. coastline every three years
— killing approximately 50 to 100 people and causing billions of
dollars worth of damage. Of these, two are considered “major"
or "intense" hurricanes (a category 3 or higher storm on the
Saffir-Simpson Hurricane
Scale).
HRD
Targeted Observations
The
NOAA HRD has determined optimal use of limited flight time aboard NOAA’s
Gulfstream-IV jet
as it gathers data for both research and forecast purposes. This technique,
known as targeted observations, is the culmination of two decades of research
and collaborations within NOAA (i.e., NOAA
Research, the NOAA
Aircraft Operation Center and the NOAA
National Weather Service), improvements to hurricane models and instrument
technology, advanced high speed computing capabilities and the acquisition
of NOAA’s G-IV jet aircraft. Specifically, given the limited number
of observations that can be obtained over an eight hour “surveillance”
mission, NOAA HRD researchers concluded that sampling in all regions around
a hurricane may not yield the best overall forecast. As a result, these
researchers developed strategies for determining and sampling specific
targets around the hurricane where observations are most likely to improve
global model
hurricane track forecasts.
The
process of finding these "targets" involves locating regions
where even slight inaccuracies in the model initial environmental conditions
can result in potential large errors in subsequent hurricane track forecasts.
These inaccuracies derive from the fact that every part of the atmosphere
cannot be sampled all the time. Instead researchers must estimate the
current atmospheric state based on the few observations they are able
to acquire. Errors in these estimates are compounded in model simulations
and increase at different rates over time. The basis of the targeted observation
strategy is identifying and sampling those regions where small changes
in atmospheric conditions result in the greatest variance in model simulations.
The result is reduced error in the final track forecast. For example,
the graphic (above left) shows the variability between the different model
simulations when using slightly different initial environmental conditions.
Where the greatest variance occurs (black dots near orange-yellow colors)
is where the observations are targeted in the G-IV surveillance missions
(Click on the NOAA image for a larger view of this graphic).
The
History of Improved Hurricane Track Forecasting
In
1982, the HRD and other NOAA offices began to investigate whether hurricane
track forecast models would provide better forecasts if the hurricane
environment were observed more accurately. Such observations are possible
with small, expendable dropwindsondes (see photograph to the right) that
are released from aircraft and measure vertical profiles of wind, temperature,
humidity and pressure as they fall from the aircraft to the ocean surface.
From 1982 to 1996, 19 such sets of observations were collected by the
NOAA Lockheed
WP-3D Orion aircraft, operated by the NOAA
Aircraft Operation Center. These data helped to reduce significantly
errors in hurricane track forecasts in three high-performing models: the
NOAA National Meteorological Center (now the NOAA
National Centers for Environmental Prediction) global model, the HRD
VICBAR model and the NOAA Geophysical
Fluid Dynamics Laboratory hurricane model.
This success
led to the development of a new, highly accurate GPS
dropwindsonde and NOAA’s acquisition of the G-IV jet aircraft
dedicated to obtain dropwindsonde measurements in regions around hurricanes.
Concurrent with these advances, NCEP improved both its global and hurricane
model systems by: improving the incorporation of data into models, advancing
representation of physical processes, increasing model resolution and
investing in high-speed computing to support the general development of
state-of-the-art models. As a result, the G-IV
is now deployed in the Atlantic basin for storms that threaten the coastal
areas of the continental United States, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands
and in the Pacific to cover hurricanes threatening southern California
and Hawaii.
Results
from the 2002 and 2003 Hurricane Seasons
During
the 2002 and 2003 hurricane seasons, a total of 32 missions — mainly
in major Hurricanes Isidore, Lili, and Isabel — utilized the targeted
observation sampling strategy. By incorporating the data into NOAA high
performance forecast models, the accuracy of NOAA hurricane track forecasts
increased by an average of 25 percent (over a five-day forecast period).
Consistently achieving this level of improvement in future hurricane track
forecasts (over 36 to 60-hour forecast intervals) will greatly assist
in the decision making process used to issue official hurricane watches
and warnings. Analysis of the last five years of missions suggests that
the GPS dropwindsondes are an especially useful tool in forecasting the
track of strong (category 4 and 5 on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale)
and rapidly intensifying hurricanes (i.e., hurricane Opal in 1995).
Benefits to Coastal Communities
As
a hurricane approaches land, successful evacuations and damage mitigation
measures, based on the most accurate landfall forecasts available, can
greatly reduce loss of lives and property. Recently, it has been estimated
to cost up to $1 million (depending on the amount of development) to prepare
each mile of coastline in a hurricane warning area. Therefore,
significant value is realized if forecasters can avoid calling for unnecessary
preparation when a hurricane comes close to, but does not strike a large
coastal community. Specifically, one complete G-IV flight of eight hours
and the required dropwindsondes cost about $40,000 — much less than
the average cost of preparing just one mile of coastline for a hurricane
landfall.
Furthermore,
according to the recently released 2004
NOAA Statistics Book, NOAA National Weather Service forecasts, warnings
and associated emergency responses result in a $3 billion savings during
a typical hurricane season. Two-thirds of this savings ($2 billion) is
attributed to the reduction in hurricane-related deaths, and one-third
of this savings ($1 billion) is attributed to a reduction in property-related
damage because of preparedness actions.
With
continued research into strategies to locate and sample specific targeted
regions during hurricane surveillance missions, more experience with twice
daily missions, and even better methods to assimilate hurricane data into
NOAA models, greater forecast improvements can be expected in the near
future.
Although
we may never be able to prevent hurricanes from making landfall along
the coastal United States, the new technology and more complete databases
developed by the NOAA HRD will yield more improved hurricane track forecasts
and give America's coastal residents the time needed to safely evacuate
the predicted landfall area, thus minimizing lose of life and property.
Relevant
Web Sites
NOAA
Hurricane Research Division
NOAA
National Hurricane Center
NOAA
Aircraft Operations Center
2004
NOAA Statistics Book
Hurricane
Frequently Asked Questions
NOAA CREATES “HISTORICAL HURRICANES MAPPING
& ANALYSIS TOOL”
NOAA’s
ATLANTIC OCEANOGRAPHIC AND METEOROLOGICAL LABORATORY
NOAA's
HURRICANE RESEARCH
O'DARK THIRTY Observations of NOAA Aircraft Production Controller/WP-3D
Flight Engineer
Media
Contact:
Jana
Goldman, NOAA Research, (301)
713-2483
|